[11:21:31] Can somone help me with this query. I think it is not working correctly: http://tinyurl.com/hkp2oen [11:21:54] probably the OR in the filter is not the way it should be done [12:06:05] How would get all strings from a given property? [12:08:02] I want to build a dictionary as I've noticed https://wdq.wmflabs.org/api?q=STRING[1733:"..."] has been silently failing [12:29:17] Figured something out https://query.wikidata.org/#SELECT%20*%20WHERE%20{%20%3Fitem%20wdt%3AP1733%20%3Fstring%20.%20} [13:24:23] Hey, search for link to put in statements into item via webconsole. [13:31:29] Thougt it was http://wdq.wmflabs.org/wdq/ , but I remember a better version... [13:35:13] Found it https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/quick_statements.php . [13:41:45] duesentrieb / Daniel K online? *_* [19:36:58] Anyone know if this query is correct? I am not so sure about how to do an OR [19:37:18] the query explanation does not seem to pick up on the OR [19:37:24] http://tinyurl.com/judsd8e [20:05:40] I'm not sure what you're trying to do, I don't see an "or" anywhere [20:09:23] nikki, I am trying to select all formations that are missing the property overlies or underlies (or both) [20:09:53] I thought this was or wdt:P568/wdt:P567* [20:09:53] P567 populate subscriptions - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P567 [20:09:53] P568 Exception 8d6615ce - https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P568 [20:10:51] Without the start at the end it says "or" in the explanation, but also says "subtype" which I don't understand. [20:11:34] hmm [20:12:38] I thought the slash was used as a way of chaining things, but I never really understood it [20:15:14] I just tried http://tinyurl.com/hzhu76u but that didn't return anything, so I don't know if it's right and there's nothing to fix, or if it's wrong somehow [20:18:59] removing the filter and selecting ?x and ?y, I don't see any missing values, so no results seems like the right result [20:20:21] This query did now count down one item (http://tinyurl.com/judsd8e) after I added both statements to one item. It might be right afterall. But I am also an absolute sparql beginner.