[13:00:41] <sDrewth>	 can someone please tell me what field is being extracted to take the description?
[13:01:00] <sDrewth>	 ie. how do I pull that field with wikibase?
[13:09:31] <multichill>	 sDrewth: Sorry, I don't get your question. What do you want to do exactly?
[13:41:04] <sDrewth>	 multichill: import the en description (if possible) to use in enWS author templates
[13:41:23] <sDrewth>	 eg. https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q443132 ... 
[13:41:23] <sDrewth>	 	
[13:41:23] <sDrewth>	 American abolitionist, author and women's rights activist
[21:31:45] <multichill>	 Busy here
[22:39:29] <melderick>	 good evening
[22:50:35] <Revent>	 melderick: o/
[22:51:59] <Revent>	 BTW, and I don’t know if anyone in here has anything to do with it, but KUDOS to the person who is now running a bot to create Commons Creator templates on the basis of Wikidata items.
[22:52:28] <Revent>	 Muchly appreciated.
[23:13:12] <multichill>	 Revent: Soon that will just be {{creator|wikidata=Q123456}} :-)
[23:13:13] <AsimovBot>	 10[1] 10https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Template:creator
[23:13:41] <Revent>	 Indeed, but it’s nice to get them sorted in the meantime.
[23:14:38] <multichill>	 It's probably the Magnus tool to auto fill the creator templates
[23:15:31] <eurodyne>	 nikki: you around?
[23:15:44] <nikki>	 hi
[23:15:56] <Revent>	 It’s BMacZeroBot that’s doing it.
[23:16:20] <Revent>	 (but might be using his tool… shrug)
[23:17:16] <multichill>	 Revent: https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-todo/creator_from_wikidata.php
[23:17:58] <Revent>	 (nods) I was aware, and have used that to do it manually… just don’t know if his bot is using it (it would make sense)
[23:20:17] <Revent>	 I added the Wikidata numbers to a buunch of the creator possible templates recently, so it’s just nice to see it being done.
[23:21:04] <multichill>	 That's nice!
[23:21:21] <multichill>	 Did you know you can also do that to paintings?
[23:22:28] <Revent>	 I know where is a whole setup for ‘object photo’ templates using the category pages, but I haven’t messed with it (other than making the ‘institution’ templates implicit on some
[23:23:07] <Revent>	 I actually knocked down the ‘artwork templates with implicit institution’ category by 4-5k a couple of weeks ago.
[23:23:23] <Revent>	 (it’s tedious, tho)
[23:24:41] <multichill>	 Yup, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Artworks_with_Wikidata_item for all the artworks that are already connected
[23:24:48] <multichill>	 Almost 22K
[23:24:53] <multichill>	 We're getting somewhere :-)
[23:25:16] <Revent>	 Those are all doing it that way? Nice!
[23:25:45] <multichill>	 It's just a wikidata = Q123 field, see for example https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Claude_monet_-_marina_%28MCM-RJ%29_01.JPG
[23:26:44] <Revent>	 Yeah, I mean all the categories that look like they are using ‘object photo’
[23:26:57] <multichill>	 Object photo is an evil hack ;-)
[23:27:08] <multichill>	 Even more evil than our usual hacks :P
[23:27:13] <Revent>	 (lol)
[23:27:31] <multichill>	 Transcluding a category as a template or whatever it did
[23:28:02] <Revent>	 Yeah, it’s ‘ugly’, but at least it gets the data there in a uniform way.
[23:28:24] <Revent>	 (not that I would sit around and do that to pages, heh)
[23:29:03] <Revent>	 Getting the ‘object’ data from WD (eventually) makes more sense.
[23:29:16] <multichill>	 Yup, quick win ahead
[23:29:33] <multichill>	 Good night
[23:30:36] <multichill>	 And follow https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T98307 . We need that for the object data template thingie
[23:30:56] <Revent>	 (added)
[23:50:12] * Josve05afk just read about the Artwork-WD-convo above. Yay, progress!