[14:29:17] I feel like theory of eternitys recent comment on publictestwiki.org is just a case of [[WP:BRO]] [14:29:23] @link [14:29:23] http://enwp.org/WP:BRO [14:29:25] [ Wikipedia:My little brother did it - Wikipedia ] - enwp.org [14:30:12] (claiming that it was their cousin that created Endymiona19) [14:30:49] oh I haven't seen their reply [14:31:37] dmehus: https://publictestwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Topic:W6e8ods2dc1clt3t&topic_showPostId=w6ed5pg94hvlanix#flow-post-w6ed5pg94hvlanix [14:31:38] [ Theory of eternity on User talk:Anton ] - publictestwiki.com [14:36:00] dmehus: how strong is CU data? [14:36:03] MacFan4000: ^ [14:36:54] on testwiki.wiki Theory of Eternity and Endymiona19 have both edited from the same ip address [14:37:08] What about UA? [14:37:21] both usernames are locked on wmf wikis - Endymiona19 as a bugumbilia sock [14:37:33] I didn't look at user agents [14:38:07] Okay [14:38:26] I mean behavourily it seems like it [14:40:35] RhinosF1, UA is too stale to compare to Bugambilia on Miraheze. I've asked Void to review the technical data on testwiki.wiki, but their claiming one of their cousins created Endymiona19 on testwiki.wiki does lead me closer to locking on Miraheze [14:41:01] looks like Theory of Eternity edited from a mobile device while Endymiona19 edited from a desktop computer [14:42:54] Ok [14:42:58] yeah, that could mean anything and doesn't disprove socking [14:43:09] Behavioural evidence is overwhelming. [14:43:14] Yeah [14:44:03] what was the OS on both the mobile and desktop devices, MacFan4000? Feel free to DM me if you prefer [14:45:46] the mobile included terms such as android and mobile safari and mozilla [14:47:03] desktop included terms such as linux safari and mozilla [15:02:48] MacFan4000, thanks, both Linux then then. [15:03:37] i see the privacy policy is being honored here [15:09:23] Naleksuh: testwiki.wiki's isn't being violated [15:09:33] It's very explicitly not [15:09:49] twhere is testwiki.wiki's Privacy Policy anyway? [15:09:57] s/twhere/where [15:09:57] dmehus meant to say: where is testwiki.wiki's Privacy Policy anyway? [15:10:20] individuals engaging in [...] deserve to have their privacy violated, at the discretion of the stewards or sysadmins. This may involve a public release of all and any available information that is otherwise considered private, or any other action that would limit further damage. [15:10:30] dmehus: https://testwiki.wiki/wiki/Test_Wiki:Privacy_policy [15:10:31] [ Test Wiki:Privacy policy - Test Wiki ] - testwiki.wiki [15:10:32] oh it's in Project: namespace [15:10:39] RhinosF1, ack thanks [15:11:31] RhinosF1 is correct actually. There's no specific mention in Test Wiki:Privacy policy related to disclosure [15:11:46] dmehus: see what I just quoted [15:11:52] It's explicit in it [15:13:04] RhinosF1, oh right, yeah because otherwise "This information is kept in a private log that can only be accessed by users with CheckUser rights, and is kept private to only those with the access to view the CheckUser logs on Test Wiki." does preclude disclosure, but the section you quoted provides an exception to that [15:13:16] Yes [15:20:51] macfan4000: would you mind if i removed https://testwiki.wiki/index.php?title=User_talk:Theory_of_Eternity&diff=15699&oldid=15698 [15:20:52] [ Difference between revisions of "User talk:Theory of Eternity" - Test Wiki ] - testwiki.wiki [15:21:02] Whenever I talk about CU data I never say what the exact results were [15:21:05] Not particularly keen on giving bug tips on how to not get caught [15:21:33] Sure [15:21:38] Go ahead [15:23:07] Oh that was like 17 hours old [15:23:13] I'm a bit late but hopefully bug didn't see it [15:24:09] I mean Anton asked them about it on mh test wiki [15:28:18] > Not particularly keen on giving bug tips on how to not get caught [15:28:19] Yeah, that's the best reason to remove that actually [15:32:11] I could suppress it [15:34:19] i don't know what the oversight policy is on testwiki but if it allows it I have no presonal objections [15:34:22] That said bug may have already seen it [15:40:49] yeah I have no objections to revision deletion or suppression, and Bug may have already seen it, though Bug doesn't seem that technically competent anyway, given how easy it is to spot a Bug sock [15:43:21] it has already been revision deleted, macfan4000 was discussing oversight it [15:45:44] Suppressed [15:47:55] Naleksuh, yeah I know, I'm just saying I had no objections to either