[11:20:36] [SemanticMaps] JeroenDeDauw pushed 1 new commit to master: https://git.io/v6VeQ [11:20:36] SemanticMaps/master a492939 Jeroen De Dauw: Merge pull request #95 from SemanticMediaWiki/PeterTheOne-patch-1... [11:27:55] [SemanticMaps] JeroenDeDauw created relnotez (+1 new commit): https://git.io/v6VvR [11:27:55] SemanticMaps/relnotez 85906b4 Jeroen De Dauw: Update RELEASE-NOTES.md... [15:31:17] [SemanticMaps] PeterTheOne created render-openlayers (+1 new commit): https://git.io/v6Vrd [15:31:17] SemanticMaps/render-openlayers dd94fd8 PeterTheOne: fix openlayers not loading bug [15:32:09] [SemanticMaps] PeterTheOne opened pull request #101: fix openlayers not loading bug (master...render-openlayers) https://git.io/v6Vrh [15:40:32] [SemanticMaps] JeroenDeDauw deleted render-openlayers at dd94fd8: https://git.io/v6VKa [18:39:16] Hey everyone, I had a user come ask me for something I hadn't considered so i figured instead of re-inventing the wheel i'd ask here [18:39:59] We have a custom built application for our users and are using SMW to track defects, software trouble reports, etc [18:40:45] I have forms built in SMW and it works well, but we were wondering about putting a button (or something) in the software so the user could generate the requisite information from the applicaiton and have it loaded to the wiki as if they created it through the form [18:41:01] So...does that make sense? and if so, is it possible? [19:36:05] camaro1967: maybe the button should be in the application itself, i.e. a push instead of a pull? [19:37:40] In general, it's not ideal to have the same set of data stored in two different places - if that's what is going on, maybe you could use the External Data extension instead. [19:37:56] ...although maybe I'm misunderstanding the situation. [20:01:59] Hi all. We have four wikis that are heavy users of SMW. Our biggest wiki is currently doing a rebuild of the semantic data. Right now it has almost 56k content pages and about 1.1 million semantic property values. Based on current trends, the rebuild will take several days. Does that sound right or is it possible I'm doing something wrong and it should be able to go much faster? [20:03:36] FWIW, two of our other wikis both have around has about 33-36k pages and 770k property values, both of which also took several days to complete their rebuilds. [20:06:57] Also FWIW, we're running MW 1.26.3 and SMW 2.3.1, though I just read at https://goo.gl/fWnRv3 that 1.26 and 2.3 have "issues", so I'm not sure if we're running into any said issues. [21:24:26] [SemanticMediaWiki] kghbln pushed 1 new commit to master: https://git.io/v6wol [21:24:26] SemanticMediaWiki/master 93773b4 Karsten Hoffmeyer: Merge pull request #1782 from SemanticMediaWiki/i18nde... [21:24:50] [SemanticMediaWiki] kghbln deleted i18nde at 8f8229c: https://git.io/v6wog [21:41:54] (CR) Dzahn: [C: -1] "I heard from Reedy that the people maintaining this use github to develop and we should ask them to do it there instead of just merging th" [extensions/SemanticBundle] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/296898 (https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T139089) (owner: Paladox) [21:48:12] [SemanticMediaWiki] kghbln created issue1389followup (+1 new commit): https://git.io/v6wiH [21:48:12] SemanticMediaWiki/issue1389followup e215e96 Karsten Hoffmeyer: Update SMW_LanguageDe.php... [21:49:20] [SemanticMediaWiki] kghbln opened pull request #1783: Update SMW_LanguageDe.php (master...issue1389followup) https://git.io/v6wPv