[00:56:24] <grrrit-wm>	 (PS1) Mwjames: Travis#185.2 [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82781
[00:56:27] <grrrit-wm>	 (CR) jenkins-bot: [V: -1] Travis#185.2 [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82781 (owner: Mwjames)
[00:59:15] <grrrit-wm>	 (CR) Mwjames: "Jenkins what?" [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82781 (owner: Mwjames)
[00:59:38] <grrrit-wm>	 (PS2) Mwjames: Travis#185.2 [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82781
[00:59:40] <grrrit-wm>	 (CR) jenkins-bot: [V: -1] Travis#185.2 [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82781 (owner: Mwjames)
[01:00:33] <grrrit-wm>	 (CR) Mwjames: "Really ???? !!!!!!" [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82781 (owner: Mwjames)
[01:01:04] <grrrit-wm>	 (CR) Yuvipanda: "Jenkins is having a little trouble after the Gerrit upgrade. People are looking at it." [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82781 (owner: Mwjames)
[03:08:08] <grrrit-wm>	 (PS3) Mwjames: Travis#185.2 [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82781
[03:12:16] <grrrit-wm>	 (CR) Mwjames: [C: 2] Travis#185.2 [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82781 (owner: Mwjames)
[03:13:56] <grrrit-wm>	 (Merged) jenkins-bot: Travis#185.2 [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82781 (owner: Mwjames)
[03:23:06] <travis-ci>	 [travis-ci] wikimedia/mediawiki-extensions-SemanticMediaWiki#186 (master - a1bf9b8 : mwjames): The build was fixed.
[03:23:06] <travis-ci>	 [travis-ci] Change view : https://github.com/wikimedia/mediawiki-extensions-SemanticMediaWiki/compare/000508ce42ae...a1bf9b8202cd
[03:23:06] <travis-ci>	 [travis-ci] Build details : http://travis-ci.org/wikimedia/mediawiki-extensions-SemanticMediaWiki/builds/11001324
[03:24:54] <grrrit-wm>	 (PS3) Mwjames: Remove addPropertyValue logic from ParserData (further compartmentalize of ParserData) [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/75295
[03:28:14] <grrrit-wm>	 (CR) Mwjames: [C: 2] Remove addPropertyValue logic from ParserData (further compartmentalize of ParserData) [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/75295 (owner: Mwjames)
[03:29:42] <grrrit-wm>	 (Merged) jenkins-bot: Remove addPropertyValue logic from ParserData (further compartmentalize of ParserData) [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/75295 (owner: Mwjames)
[04:32:38] <grrrit-wm>	 (PS1) Mwjames: Rename addPropertyValue -> addDataValue [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82797
[04:52:21] <grrrit-wm>	 (PS2) Mwjames: Rename addPropertyValue -> addDataValue [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82797
[04:55:25] <grrrit-wm>	 (CR) Mwjames: [C: 2] Rename addPropertyValue -> addDataValue [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82797 (owner: Mwjames)
[04:57:39] <grrrit-wm>	 (Merged) jenkins-bot: Rename addPropertyValue -> addDataValue [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82797 (owner: Mwjames)
[06:57:36] <Fannon>	 Hi There! I'm new to SMW, taking a look at it since a week. I will be using it for my bachelor thesis. Has somebody here some recommendations or some time for Q&A?
[07:00:01] <bonsaikitten>	 why do you intend to use smw ?
[07:00:47] <Fannon>	 I'm not fixed to that, but my work will be to organize business knowledge in a wikipedia a more flexible and structured way
[07:01:06] <Fannon>	 ans so far i've looked semantic web technologies are just fine for that
[07:01:13] <Fannon>	 and no much alternatives to SMW it seems
[07:03:05] <Fannon>	 I guess i will be using 4store as RDF Triplestore so i can use SPARQL Querys
[07:03:07] <bonsaikitten>	 my exposure to SMW has mostly been "why is this not working"
[07:03:23] <bonsaikitten>	 heh, I filed some bugs because 4store didn't work at all for SMW
[07:03:25] <Fannon>	 hehe, still youre here
[07:03:31] <Fannon>	 ok
[07:03:36] <bonsaikitten>	 well, I still have a legacy app at work that hasn't been replaced
[07:03:47] <Fannon>	 I#ve just set up the basiscs of MediaWiki & Semantic Bundle
[07:03:52] <Fannon>	 havent tryed 4store yet
[07:04:34] <Fannon>	 you have some ideas how to solve this problems or some other solutions?
[07:06:20] <bonsaikitten>	 I've mostly given up on MW being anywhere near sane, and SMW doing anything properly
[07:06:38] <bonsaikitten>	 good ideas, but ... ideas alone don't get you anywhere
[07:06:59] <Fannon>	 yeah
[07:07:27] <Fannon>	 that is my biggest worry right now
[07:07:49] <Fannon>	 MediaWiki and SMW feel like Software from the 90's
[07:08:17] <Fannon>	 Still, SMW and Semantic Web in general seems to be a very genius thing
[07:08:26] <Fannon>	 something most people wouldn't even understand
[07:08:35] <Fannon>	 but this is also its biggest problem
[07:08:48] <Fannon>	 my job is to make something that people can use and understand
[07:09:14] <bonsaikitten>	 the templates, for example, are horrible to do anything more complex
[07:09:22] <bonsaikitten>	 e.g. counting, adding, doing basic math
[07:09:37] <Fannon>	 yes.. but thats a MediaWiki Problem in origin I think
[07:09:44] <bonsaikitten>	 so if you intend to do more than *display* stuff, well, you're screwed
[07:10:07] <Fannon>	 and using SPARQL and some display Plugins?
[07:14:34] <Fannon>	 but this wouldn't be too much of a problem. If its hard on me to make Querys thats OK - but for the user it should be easy to add and manage content/data. Thats what I'm not sure of
[07:14:35] <bonsaikitten>	 if it works it's nice :)
[07:14:35] <bonsaikitten>	 *if* ... I've seen random misbehaviour that was mostly due to not considering input validation
[07:14:35] <bonsaikitten>	 or things like "I have no idea what your query meant, so here's 10 random things that might be a valid result, or not"
[07:14:35] <Fannon>	 hehe
[07:15:25] <Fannon>	 ok, but that may be a semantic web thing in general
[07:15:27] <bonsaikitten>	 (which is hilarious the first few dozen times, and then you wonder what ... brain ... happen ... why ... developer)
[07:15:43] <bonsaikitten>	 no, it's just MW/SMW being derpy. it refuses to consider errors
[07:16:53] <Fannon>	 input validation ... that means having the correct datatypes?
[07:17:33] <bonsaikitten>	 yeah, for MW everything is a string
[07:17:38] <bonsaikitten>	 and string is ok
[07:17:51] <bonsaikitten>	 hard to enforce things when the machinery is too lenient :\
[07:18:58] <bonsaikitten>	 (I haven't found out a good way to prevent someone from changing e.g. [[Category::Foo]] to a non-existing Category, so you can only hope people don't do too much stupid)
[07:20:42] <Fannon>	 hehe.. but thats something you should consider
[07:20:56] <Fannon>	 users always do stupid things.. its just a matter of time
[07:21:09] <bonsaikitten>	 yes, and sometimes you wish to restrict input to certain values
[07:21:12] <Fannon>	 this shouldn't break the thing when it happens
[07:21:20] <Fannon>	 or you should prevent it to happen somehow
[07:21:21] <bonsaikitten>	 e.g. only allow categories that exist
[07:21:45] <Fannon>	 ok, but then youre looking for a more closed system right?
[07:22:21] <Fannon>	 http://aksw.org/Projects/OntoWiki.html
[07:22:24] <bonsaikitten>	 yes, for my needs using a "proper" web-framework and writing a custom app makes a lot more sense
[07:22:40] <Fannon>	 what are youre needs?
[07:22:47] <bonsaikitten>	 consistent data :)
[07:22:57] <Fannon>	 well.. you still could use a RDF Database with SPARQL
[07:23:08] <Fannon>	 and just have an interface that enforces strict data
[07:23:23] <Fannon>	 so you have the flexibility and still the strictness
[07:23:42] <bonsaikitten>	 or I just use a SQL DB which maps quite well to the datasets I have
[07:24:40] <Fannon>	 ok, but then its a matter of the right choosing of database structure in general
[07:25:02] <bonsaikitten>	 the problem with wikis is that they hide all that from you
[07:25:04] <Fannon>	 a SQL database is no real competitor to RDF Databases imho
[07:25:08] <bonsaikitten>	 makes sense for some problems
[07:25:14] <Fannon>	 both is way to different
[07:25:15] <bonsaikitten>	 but in general it leads to madness
[07:25:28] <bonsaikitten>	 RDF makes sense for graph-like datastructures
[07:25:39] <bonsaikitten>	 SQL makes sense for well-structured data
[07:25:54] <Fannon>	 it makes especially sense if the structure of your data changes often and cannot be forseen
[07:26:18] <bonsaikitten>	 I haven't run into such a situation yet
[07:26:27] <bonsaikitten>	 either I know what I'm doing, or not ;)
[07:26:31] <Fannon>	 if you can make a definitve schema of your data and youre sure it wont change to often, then youre better of with MySQL ;)
[07:27:21] <bonsaikitten>	 no, definitely not
[07:27:25] <bonsaikitten>	 I like consistent data
[07:27:27] <Fannon>	 hm, i've used Symfony 2 a while ago
[07:27:32] <Fannon>	 and Doctrine as ORM
[07:27:42] <bonsaikitten>	 (e.g. store a date of "2013-09-123" in mysql ... hahaha ... FUUUUUU)
[07:28:00] <bonsaikitten>	 also, php ... hmm ... no! :)
[07:28:09] <Fannon>	 with most ORMs you can migrate your database Scheme with only a medium pain in the ass
[07:28:23] <Fannon>	 Or use Django if you prefer Python ;)
[07:28:29] <bonsaikitten>	 Flask actually
[07:28:31] <Fannon>	 was nice to work with, too
[07:28:42] <bonsaikitten>	 it's designed the way I'd do it
[07:29:48] <Fannon>	 Hm, writing a bigger system on a own, its also a risk
[07:30:16] <bonsaikitten>	 I know, but with SMW there's also performance problems
[07:30:43] <bonsaikitten>	 when a page view takes 40k DB queries and ~60 seconds walltime ... well ... burn it with fire
[07:30:50] <bonsaikitten>	 it's designed for small datasets :(
[07:31:31] <Fannon>	 My professor showed my his SMW Experiments
[07:31:37] <Fannon>	 he compained about bad performance too
[07:31:50] <Fannon>	 he told me to look into it and check if there's something to do about
[07:32:20] <Fannon>	 I guess Graph Based Databases are not easy on a server
[07:32:26] <bonsaikitten>	 yeah, don't use SMW ;)
[07:32:42] <bonsaikitten>	 MW already uses the DB as a NoSQL storage
[07:32:51] <bonsaikitten>	 and SMW just piles on random whatever
[07:33:16] <Fannon>	 well. its RDF Triples i guess
[07:33:20] <Fannon>	 of couse its random piles
[07:33:23] <Fannon>	 thats the way it works
[07:34:03] <bonsaikitten>	 MW has a "BagOfBytes" storage class that's compressed serialized PHP objects
[07:34:13] <bonsaikitten>	 that's the worst abuse of a SQL DB I can remember
[07:34:16] <Fannon>	 hehe
[07:34:20] <Fannon>	 ok, yes thats right
[07:34:26] <bonsaikitten>	 it's almost like these people hate SQL :)
[07:34:33] <bonsaikitten>	 (because MySQL, ok, that's understandable)
[07:34:45] <Fannon>	 well.. NoSQL Databases are a nice thing too
[07:35:01] <Fannon>	 but almost no server has one installed
[07:35:08] <Fannon>	 so you abuse mysql just for everything
[07:35:20] <bonsaikitten>	 no, they aren't
[07:35:31] <bonsaikitten>	 it's just people thinking "this is too much work, I can do it better"
[07:35:39] <bonsaikitten>	 and mysql ... no! :)
[07:35:54] <Fannon>	 hm?
[07:36:10] <bonsaikitten>	 mysql is a horrible thing
[07:37:11] <Fannon>	 hm, why?
[07:37:14] <Fannon>	 its a bit like PHP
[07:37:21] <Fannon>	 People often hate it
[07:37:34] <Fannon>	 but it works just fine if you get used to the "Frankenstein" Way :D
[07:37:46] <bonsaikitten>	 yeah, it's crap
[07:37:46] <Fannon>	 and since everyone is using it, you get to solutions very fast
[07:37:52] <bonsaikitten>	 I can't tolerate such badness
[07:38:04] <Fannon>	 well, I hate the way PHP is designed
[07:38:09] <bonsaikitten>	 I mean, silent corruption of data? why do I even bother with a database then
[07:38:13] <Fannon>	 but I've used both Python and PHP for Web development
[07:38:21] <Fannon>	 And i totally understand preferring PHP
[07:38:25] <Fannon>	 if you want to get the job done
[07:38:54] <bonsaikitten>	 I prefer correct over fast
[07:39:14] <Fannon>	 You can do good programs in both languages
[07:39:17] <Fannon>	 it depends on the programmer
[07:39:26] <bonsaikitten>	 you can't write correct code in php
[07:39:44] <Fannon>	 it doesnt make it as easy as python, thats true
[07:39:46] <bonsaikitten>	 http://me.veekun.com/blog/2012/04/09/php-a-fractal-of-bad-design/ # read that
[07:39:56] <bonsaikitten>	 no, you *cannot*. The language is inherently unstable
[07:40:22] <Fannon>	 I'll do
[07:40:25] <Fannon>	 (later)
[07:41:31] <Fannon>	 Hm, but I disagree with this partly
[07:41:45] <Fannon>	 You can do very good Web Software with PHP
[07:42:05] <Fannon>	 In Fact I havent seen much good Python Web Software anywhere
[07:42:16] <bonsaikitten>	 "foo" == TRUE, and "foo" == 0… but, of course, TRUE != 0.
[07:42:23] <bonsaikitten>	 ^^ that is hilarious
[07:42:39] <bonsaikitten>	 yeah, python has been infected with people that don't like use brain, is srsly hard
[07:42:46] <Fannon>	 yes, it is.. but if you know it and keep youre safeguards
[07:42:55] <Fannon>	 you can work around those strange behaviours
[07:43:50] <Fannon>	 and .. python web performance isnt really good
[07:44:13] <Fannon>	 I do understand People going over to Scala
[07:45:02] <Fannon>	 Python.. It feels like it doesnt want to be a web programming language
[07:45:24] <Fannon>	 the community i mean, not the language itself
[07:46:12] <bonsaikitten>	 I'm doing <30msec per page now with Flask
[07:46:26] <bonsaikitten>	 that's ... well ... it makes me not worry about performance that much
[07:46:29] <Fannon>	 well i was doing <10ms per page with symfony 2
[07:46:36] <Fannon>	 and thats a full fledged framework
[07:46:39] <bonsaikitten>	 compared to Drupal, LOL
[07:46:46] <Fannon>	 drupal is no framework
[07:46:50] <Fannon>	 its a CMS
[07:46:57] <Fannon>	 you cant compare that
[07:47:02] <bonsaikitten>	 it's a pile of madness :)
[07:47:22] <Fannon>	 well, it works very well for a lot of people
[07:47:25] <Fannon>	 and it gets used
[07:47:42] <bonsaikitten>	 yeah, pays well
[07:48:02] <Fannon>	 I suppose you're the idealistic kind of programmer
[07:48:04] <bonsaikitten>	 I like drupal for its badness
[07:49:24] <Fannon>	 Well.. program a software by yourself and look at the code 8 years later
[07:49:31] <Fannon>	 i guess you would call it the same ;)
[07:49:41] <Fannon>	 and its easier if youre just doing it alone
[07:49:49] <bonsaikitten>	 $ php -r 'var_dump("61529519452809720693702583126814" == "61529519452809720000000000000000");'
[07:49:49] <bonsaikitten>	 bool(true)
[07:49:52] <Fannon>	 getting a community to work on a big project like this
[07:49:55] <bonsaikitten>	 ^^ so funny
[07:50:25] <Fannon>	 well, thats not a real world case
[07:50:39] <Fannon>	 and likely has to do with C under the hod
[07:50:41] <Fannon>	 hood*
[07:50:49] <bonsaikitten>	 it is, it's what made password validation so broken
[07:51:46] <Fannon>	 ah ok I see
[07:52:22] <Fannon>	 well, i have to go afk now
[07:52:28] <Fannon>	 have a good time
[07:52:50] <Fannon>	 and good luck with finding/choosing a good solution
[07:57:52] <bonsaikitten>	 :)
[09:16:08] <Fannon>	 re
[12:19:30] <grrrit-wm>	 (PS3) Mwjames: (Bug 52396) use getSubject()->getDBkey() instead [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/77126
[12:35:05] <grrrit-wm>	 (PS4) Mwjames: (Bug 52396) use getSubject()->getDBkey() instead [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/77126
[12:37:22] <grrrit-wm>	 (CR) Mwjames: [C: 2] (Bug 52396) use getSubject()->getDBkey() instead [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/77126 (owner: Mwjames)
[12:38:52] <grrrit-wm>	 (Merged) jenkins-bot: (Bug 52396) use getSubject()->getDBkey() instead [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/77126 (owner: Mwjames)
[13:18:49] <sven^>	 yaron: thanks. Semantic Tasks is exactly what I need ;)
[13:19:09] <yaron>	 Cool!
[13:19:58] <sven^>	 why do I try to write something myself before looking if it exists? :p
[13:21:17] <sven^>	 weeeh. Only works for SMW 1.5 and 1.6 :/
[13:23:21] <sven^>	 ok, the page is just out of date ;)
[13:24:52] <yaron>	 *phew*
[13:28:25] <sven^>	 hmm, but it doesn't really work the way I need it..
[13:31:49] <sven^>	 well, it's a start. Thanks anyways
[13:32:41] <yaron>	 Care to provide any more information?
[13:35:04] <sven^>	 well, I have an already set up collection of forms/templates that provide a calendar for dead-lines, appointments, meetings, todos, etc
[13:36:05] <sven^>	 actually all I want to do is send mails to ResponiblePerson on all dates that have [[DateCategory::ToDo]]
[13:36:38] <sven^>	 the extension has "Assigned to" and "Target Date" hardcoded
[13:36:44] <sven^>	 so either I change the code
[13:36:55] <sven^>	 or I change like 10 templates/forms in my wiki
[13:38:00] <sven^>	 oh an there should also be mail to a general address if there is no responsible person set for a [[DateCategory::Concert]]
[13:38:02] <sven^>	 and so on
[13:38:22] <sven^>	 I guess it's too special to use an already existing extension for that
[13:40:29] <sven^>	 but it's a good start for me to see how to run queries from the commandline ;)
[13:45:07] <yaron>	 sven^: ah, okay. Well, you don't really need to change any forms - just add those particular properties to the templates.
[13:45:55] <yaron>	 That by itself would do everything you need, no?
[13:46:11] <yaron>	 There might not be a need for a default email address.
[13:46:32] <sven^>	 yeah, that could work
[13:46:44] <sven^>	 but I guess I will just write something on my own
[13:46:58] <sven^>	 stuff like the task update Mails are not good
[13:47:01] <sven^>	 (for me)
[13:47:19] <sven^>	 I don't want to spam 50 ppl with mails everytime a task is changed
[13:47:47] <yaron>	 You mean, when the date of the task is changed?
[13:50:00] <sven^>	 for example
[13:50:28] <sven^>	 I don't need/want the ArticleSave hook at all
[13:50:34] <sven^>	 I just want the cronjob part
[13:50:59] <yaron>	 But if the deadline for a task changes, don't you want everyone to know right away?
[13:51:10] <sven^>	 nah
[13:51:16] <sven^>	 most of the stuff is fixed
[13:51:34] <sven^>	 it volunteer work. We meet every week and plan concerts and stuff like that
[13:52:16] <sven^>	 dates for already booked concerts almost never change
[13:52:37] <yaron>	 Okay. In that case, people won't get spammed, I don't think.
[13:52:53] <sven^>	 the responsible person can change
[13:52:55] <sven^>	 or the caterer
[13:53:06] <sven^>	 or the light/audio-technican
[13:53:17] <yaron>	 Oh - so ST sends out an email any time a page is modified?
[13:53:29] <sven^>	 that's how I understand it, yes
[13:53:38] <yaron>	 I didn't think that was the case...
[13:53:39] <sven^>	 I haven't looked at that part of the code yet
[13:53:52] <sven^>	 but the description on the extension's page sounds like that
[13:54:12] <sven^>	 "Notification emails are sent when a page is saved that has [[Assigned to::*]] and/or [[Carbon copy::*]] and [[Reminder at::*]] and/or [[Target date::*]] properties."
[13:54:54] <yaron>	 Ah, yes...
[13:54:57] <sven^>	 $wgHooks['ArticleSaveComplete'][] = ....
[13:55:06] <yaron>	 That's strange. Ideally there could be just a setting to disable those.
[14:50:09] <sven^>	 wow. I cannot query for my "Datum" property. Something is very wrong here :/
[14:51:56] <sven^>	 There is a page for "Property:Datum" but Datum is not listed in "Special:Properties"
[15:03:33] <yaron>	 sven^: is it in Special:UnusedProperties, maybe?
[15:04:58] <Fannon>	 Hi! I've just connected SMW to 4store, but no RDF Data appears there
[15:05:08] <Fannon>	 Have I missed something obvious?
[16:10:52] <sven^>	 yaron: yes it is, but why?
[16:11:16] <yaron>	 I assume because it's not getting used?
[16:11:48] <sven^>	 if I go to Property:Datum there are like 600 pages listed
[16:13:15] <sven^>	 there are several properties in unused properties that are used
[16:13:26] <sven^>	 Email for example is used on like 250 pages
[16:14:05] <yaron>	 Ah - it sounds like a bug, then.
[16:14:21] <yaron>	 Maybe one that's specific to certain property types, like Date and Email.
[16:14:46] <sven^>	 I think it's related to properties having the same name as their datatypes
[16:15:31] <yaron>	 Oh... interesting.
[16:15:42] <sven^>	 no, wait
[16:15:48] <sven^>	 Email has type String
[16:15:51] <sven^>	 so that's not it
[16:16:07] <yaron>	 Well, maybe just properties that have the name of a datatype.
[16:18:07] <sven^>	 could the problem be that I use "datum" instead of "Datum" when setting the property?
[16:18:24] <sven^>	 maybe #ask is just a bit more forgiving at works anyways
[16:18:34] <yaron>	 I doubt it.
[16:19:07] <yaron>	 The data is being stored correctly, clearly.
[17:19:00] <sven^>	 so after renaming the Date property it works.
[17:19:06] <sven^>	 wow
[19:00:28] <yaron>	 sven^: cool, you found a bug - it would be great if you could file a bug report on it, on Bugzilla.
[19:50:13] <grrrit-wm>	 (PS1) Jeroen De Dauw: Update dependency names [extensions/Validator] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82889
[19:50:33] <grrrit-wm>	 (CR) Jeroen De Dauw: [C: 2] Update dependency names [extensions/Validator] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/82889 (owner: Jeroen De Dauw)
[21:15:01] <grrrit-wm>	 (PS1) Mwjames: Nicified Special:Properties search form [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/83014
[22:03:40] <grrrit-wm>	 (CR) Mwjames: [C: 2] Nicified Special:Properties search form [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/83014 (owner: Mwjames)
[22:05:16] <grrrit-wm>	 (Merged) jenkins-bot: Nicified Special:Properties search form [extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/83014 (owner: Mwjames)