[10:47:18] <grrrit-wm>	 (CR) Netbrain: [C: 1] Clarify maps-displaymap-par-visitedicon [extensions/Maps] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/78391 (owner: Nemo bis)
[14:11:45] <grrrit-wm>	 (PS1) MathiasLidal: Commit initial version of new category input type [extensions/SemanticForms] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/79051
[14:12:15] <grrrit-wm>	 (Abandoned) MathiasLidal: Commit initial version of new category input type [extensions/SemanticForms] - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/79051 (owner: MathiasLidal)
[14:28:00] <samuell>	 A question on how to sort #Ask results so that: TOP1 <  ... < TOP10 ... i.e. "alphanumerically" :
[14:28:00] <samuell>	 https://plus.google.com/u/0/104186710895049917005/posts/2ECKThVxHgF
[14:31:47] <Saruman>	 samuell: http://semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Selecting_pages#Sorting_results
[16:05:43] <samuell>	 Saruman, Tx, will check!
[16:28:37] <samuell>	 Hmm, so alphanumerical sorting does not seem to be supported natively.
[16:39:01] <Saruman>	 samuell: i disagree, the default sorting is indeed alphanumerical
[16:39:31] <Saruman>	 however, looking at your superuser.com link, it seems you want something els
[16:40:05] <Saruman>	 you seem to want a kind of pattern matching where the sort "understands" that TOP10 comes after TOP9, and not before
[16:40:17] <samuell>	 Saruman, Exactl
[16:40:18] <samuell>	 y
[16:40:30] <samuell>	 ... I thought that is what "alphanumerical" means :)
[16:40:42] <Saruman>	 it does not :-O
[16:40:57] <Saruman>	 alphanumeric just means letters+numbers
[16:41:43] <Saruman>	 solutions to your problem: have another property contain just the numeric value, e.g. [[Has TOP::1]]
[16:41:59] <Saruman>	 or to pad the numbers with zeroes
[16:42:05] <samuell>	 Saruman, Yes, I proposed that to Egon already :)
[16:42:48] <samuell>	 Maybe the cleanest solution, would be to hack the dynamic java-script sorting with a custom one, I guess ...
[16:42:59] <samuell>	 That would avoid adding an extra property to the pages.
[16:43:12] <Saruman>	 mom, phone
[17:57:06] <Saruman>	 samuell, what does having TOP in the property add to your semantic model?
[17:57:33] <samuell>	 Saruman, Not sure ... not my question originally :)
[17:58:15] <Saruman>	 ok, but since your original question is now answered, you may want to reconsider that
[17:58:53] <samuell>	 Yeah, we will see what Egon answers on the superuser question.
[17:58:55] <Saruman>	 in general, it's tough to have your code correct an incorrect information model
[17:59:29] <Saruman>	 if each and every value of the property is of the form TOP<n>, then you don't need TOP in that property
[18:00:10] <samuell>	 Saruman, True, but I suppose it is a label used in the original data
[18:02:41] <Saruman>	 granted, but no need to semantify the whole label, if the information  model says you only want to use the numeric part - as a number