[00:20:00] <gerrit-wm>	 New patchset: Mwjames; "Move some more files to /include" [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticMediaWiki] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/57445
[11:47:38] <gerrit-wm>	 New patchset: Vedmaka Wakalaka; "Improves "values from query" to be dynamic." [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticForms] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/57170
[11:51:21] <gerrit-wm>	 New patchset: Vedmaka Wakalaka; "Improves "values from query" to be dynamic." [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticForms] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/57170
[11:52:42] <gerrit-wm>	 New review: Vedmaka Wakalaka; "* removed encoded image, use SF loading.gif instead" [mediawiki/extensions/SemanticForms] (master) - https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/57170
[12:42:52] <Velyks>	 Hey, is there any way to change the heading of property columns in queries when they're displayed as a table?
[13:07:38] <yaron>	 Velyks: yes - "?propertyName=columnLabel".
[13:07:49] <Velyks>	 Thanks
[17:31:37] <salquint>	 Yaron, believe it or not I've got a Semantic Compound Queries question for you.  Is there any way to pass an argument or some kind of context indicator to a (format=) template to let it know which query answer it's processing?  "Which" could mean 1 or 2, something simple.
[17:40:46] <Yaron>	 salquint: I'm... shocked!
[17:41:12] <Yaron>	 But I don't think so, no.
[17:41:54] <Yaron>	 ...although you can set various parameters per-query.
[17:42:50] <salquint>	 yes... and maybe try and discern the origin from type or something.  I'm playing with that.
[17:47:13] <salquint>	 Oh, simple, I'll just send another argument again, a different one per query component, and what it compares to indicates where it came from.  Is this your first compound query question for 2013, or do you get them regularly?
[17:53:18] <salquint>	 well that didn't quite work, it recognized one field and ignored the other, but I think I can make it work.
[18:11:24] <Yaron>	 salquint: I don't think it's my first SCQ question, but then again we just had SMWCon a few weeks ago, so that sort of stacks the odds.
[18:11:32] <salquint>	 Ah
[18:15:24] <salquint>	 The ... Compound page says that the filters and the names of properties to be displayed can be unique, but I'm finding that if I have properties in each, and the last property in each is different, it uses the last property of the last query section for all queries.  That's not how it's supposed to work, right?
[18:48:09] <Yaron>	 salquint: I'm not sure now... it could be that you have to label different properties the same for SCQ to treat them as the same thing.
[18:51:29] <salquint>	 Yes, I did that.  I also had an older version, now I'm at 0.3.2, and this time it's the first query that drives the results rather than the last one
[18:56:36] <Yaron>	 I don't know, then.
[19:00:31] <salquint>	 I'll try it on a sandbox with the latest