[14:15:10] [02miraheze/services] 07MirahezeSSLBot pushed 031 commit to 03master [+0/-0/±1] 13https://git.io/fAvCm [14:15:12] [02miraheze/services] 07MirahezeSSLBot 0301284d3 - BOT: Updating services config for wikis [14:19:21] Good morning [14:20:24] morning [14:23:27] Quite the sitename https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:RequestWikiQueue/5640 [14:23:28] Title: [ Wiki requests queue - Miraheze Meta ] - meta.miraheze.org [14:23:35] Is that even valid? [14:24:08] yeah [14:24:47] I wonder how that sitename will work with a project namespace [14:25:00] Or even the search bar, where it says “Search xxwiki” [14:28:10] it'll work somehow [14:41:01] Shouldn’t we just add the +O ChanServ flag to everyone who currently has the +V flag (except Not-7f3d) while the channel is muted? [14:47:06] was discussed and it's a permanent solution for a temporary problem we don't want to have [14:47:38] having a problem be a pain provides greater motivation to monitor and revert back asap than having something seem seemless [14:48:06] *seamless [14:49:03] Hm [14:49:21] The spambot problem seems to be fairly permanent though... [14:50:34] We uasually don’t get much spam here [14:50:39] but this system we have is unworkable though [14:53:01] How is it “unworkable”? [14:53:09] If that’s the case, why are we using it? [14:53:49] because until this spam started, it was a system that worked [14:56:16] * AmandaCatherine is confused [15:00:24] Only ops can see all messages and non-ops can only see some messages [15:00:57] which in a community project, isn't helpful as it removes the ability for everyone to engage in discussion and start them freely as only certain people can see what they're saying [15:01:16] Okay, that’s inconvenient [15:01:16] But why are we doing that? [15:01:17] Just don’t have botbot log the spam [15:01:36] (i.e. mode +q [d__d]) [15:01:59] that stops botbot talking [15:02:22] and you can't filter a log otherwise it's not really a log of a whole conversation [15:02:34] (well not effectively anyway) [15:02:50] but unfortunately right now, spambots are part of the “conversation” [15:03:20] and it's unfortunate [15:03:38] I wouldn't mind reverting back and having everything logged but others disagree so I'm letting them handle it [15:20:51] BBL [15:49:17] [02miraheze/ssl] 07MirahezeSSLBot pushed 031 commit to 03master [+0/-0/±1] 13https://git.io/fAv8o [15:49:18] [02miraheze/ssl] 07MirahezeSSLBot 0393ee520 - Bot: Update SSL cert for cornetto.online [16:24:44] Assuming they continue linking to the same stuff, that was actually a rather amusing video. [16:25:07] Risky click of the day for sure, but I figured it can't be too bad since it's on youtube. [although unlisted videos could take a while to get removed] [16:35:33] Wouldn't it be better if Interwikis applications were made in Phabricator instead of Community noticeboard? https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Interwiki_administrators [16:35:34] Title: [ Interwiki administrators - Miraheze Meta ] - meta.miraheze.org [16:36:58] no because phabricator is a technical only platform, we don't intend to expand it to community related areas [16:37:49] ah, ok [21:15:31] Guys i just made up this parts list for a pc i wouldnt mind having (if i ever had the amount it costs) what yall think? https://pcpartpicker.com/user/Zppix/saved/#view=2YQ6sY [21:15:31] Title: [ Zppix - Saved Part Lists - PCPartPicker ] - pcpartpicker.com [23:14:57] Why you going for a Xeon? [23:15:19] If I were you, I would go for an i7 or i9 if you wanted top end gaming performance. [23:15:28] If you wanted a server style performance, a Xeon is good. [23:15:45] But that's an insane build [23:15:54] 4 sticks of DDR4 memory [23:16:14] That stick of memory alone is more expensive than my entire PC [23:58:23] @cnocbride Cause why not go all out if your doing a kickass build [23:59:33] xD yes, but Xeon's aren't always good. Depends on what you want. [23:59:41] Xeon's are good for workstations and doing graphic stations. [23:59:47] i7/i9's are better for gaming.