[03:31:02] 👍 [03:54:29] @CVT active vandalism https://nonbinary.wiki/wiki/Special:Contributions/2600:6C64:637F:F654:65BD:37F2:5464:7ADC [03:54:30] [ User contributions for 2600:6C64:637F:F654:65BD:37F2:5464:7ADC - Nonbinary Wiki ] - nonbinary.wiki [03:59:34] :BanCatMH: [19:12:02] .mhca BlackWidowMovie0 [19:12:02] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/BlackWidowMovie0 [19:13:07] What's this about? [19:13:38] something was off [19:13:44] doesn't matter [19:23:21] https://crappygames.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:Log/newusers Could someone have a look at the User Creation Log? Some of these accounts look like they were created at the exact same time. [19:23:32] [ User creation log - Crappy Games Wiki ] - crappygames.miraheze.org [19:23:36] and? [19:23:44] some bad activity? [19:24:24] Kringe claimed that at least 5 accounts were created at the same time. I could screenshot them. [19:24:45] He is blocked somewhere? [19:28:15] Here they are. [19:28:15] https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/443926951292567562/785588501541814282/bandicam_2020-12-07_14-27-06-484.jpg [20:39:18] [[Special:CentralAuth/Nathan.io]] I have a reason to believe this user is a sockpuppet of the last user that was banned with this topic as a clue: https://loathsomecharacters.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Topic:Vz6ahiy2bvija71h&topic_showPostId=vz6b2vlw7jktjaoj#flow-post-vz6b2vlw7jktjaoj [20:39:19] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Nathan.io [20:39:21] [ Global account information for Nathan.io - Miraheze Meta ] - meta.miraheze.org [20:39:21] [ Who are you? on User talk:Nathan.io ] - loathsomecharacters.miraheze.org [23:00:55] Also, if I may, is it possible for a steward to do a possible CheckUser on Sharky 101 to see if the user has any more sock accounts, if it's possible? [23:07:28] @DarkMatterMan4500 No, that would be fishing, which is not appropriate. There must be fairly conclusive behavioural evidence on both the suspect and target accounts, and there must be a clear need (i.e., user creating multiple accounts to evade bans, for which a rangeblock could help prevent that). [23:08:06] @Doug Oops. [23:09:26] And to answer that one, a rangeblock will do just fine. [23:12:29] :NotdoneMH: as either (a) contingent on the former, for which there is no evidence of need nor evidence at all or (b) cannot be undertaken [23:14:14] @Doug https://loathsomecharacters.miraheze.org/w/index.php?title=Topic:Vz6ahiy2bvija71h&topic_showPostId=vz6b2vlw7jktjaoj#flow-post-vz6b2vlw7jktjaoj Here's some behavioral evidence for you on this topic discussion page for you to look at. [23:14:16] [ Who are you? on User talk:Nathan.io ] - loathsomecharacters.miraheze.org [23:16:54] :NotdoneMH: No need. User is locally blocked on single wiki to which they've ever contributed. No evidence of active disruption. Plus, even if there were a need, evidence is highly circumstantial and vague, at best. [23:17:58] @Doug Alright. Thanks for your valuable opinion on the matter, so I guess we're good. [23:19:54] Yes, you can keep monitoring it, collect multiple diffs from future accounts created and if we see conclusive and substantial evidence of a user appearing to operate a small army of sockpuppets and not letting up, then we might be in a different situation, and I'd probably prefer to leave it to one of the other stewards anyway. [23:20:58] Thank you very much Doug. [23:23:11] @DarkMatterMan4500 No problem. :)