[01:36:06] is that an account thats still unblocked? [01:51:16] @Stewards Possible a username policy violation in User:SheldonFag on Meta [01:51:31] .mhca SheldonFag [01:51:31] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/SheldonFag [17:28:02] @CVT I've locally blocked spam-only account User:LynHaigler for three days on Meta, to prevent further clogging up of the AbuseLog until you've taken care of them globally. Thanks. [17:33:14] Thanks, @MrJaroslavik. :) [17:33:56] Blocks in these cases are not needed, but thanks for the report. [17:34:41] > Blocks in these cases are not needed, but thanks for the report. @MrJaroslavik (OFF) Yeah, that's why I just made it for a very short term, so it would lapse once you guys had taken care of it. [17:40:09] Also sorry for small activity, last week was very hectic for me 🤪 [17:45:48] @MrJaroslavik (OFF) No worries; we're all volunteers, so any activity is great. I did notice less spambot locking though. 😛 [17:48:39] It's "very" difficult activity for monitoring. In day relatively okay, check time from time, sometimes 3 spambots, sometimes 5,etc. But for example between 23h and 7h is there about 20-30 spambots in most cases. [17:52:34] Other things like reports (about 2/3 per day) are "very" easy. [18:00:54] > It's "very" difficult activity for monitoring. In day relatively okay, check time from time, sometimes 3 spambots, sometimes 5,etc. But for example between 23h and 7h is there about 20-30 spambots in most cases. @MrJaroslavik (OFF) Yeah, are you two or three hours ahead of UTC time? [18:13:50] I am +1 or +2 (summer time) [18:56:26] > I am +1 or +2 (summer time) @MrJaroslavik (OFF) ah, cool, so it's 11:55 AM here. Is it almost 9 PM where you are? [18:57:07] Yes, 20:56 (= 8:56PM) here [18:57:17] ah, okay, cool, thanks [20:12:07] @CircleyDoesTest See #cvt-feed re: the abuse filters Μπέλα2006 added on his aoc2wiki. I think the abuse filters are a good-faith idea, in theory, but are too strict. Admittedly, abuse filters are not a strength of mine, so I'm not sure the best to fix them (or if it's even worth the trouble, given the low level of page creations on that wiki). I do have the sysop flag on my account on that wiki, only because he needed help with importing [20:12:07] some initial templates, but I wouldn't feel comfortable making any changes on that wiki. I see you're more involved there than I, so just thought I'd ping you to see if you can discuss with him maybe? [20:12:47] s/the best to/the best way to [20:12:47] dmehus meant to say: @CircleyDoesTest See #cvt-feed re: the abuse filters Μπέλα2006 added on his aoc2wiki. I think the abuse filters are a good-faith idea, in theory, but are too strict. Admittedly, abuse filters are not a strength of mine, so I'm not sure the best way to fix them (or if it's even worth the trouble, given the low level of page creations on that wiki). I do have the sysop flag on my account on that wiki, only because he [22:59:32] @CVT User:ZGYGladis7644 is/was spamming the abuse filters on loginwiki. Appears to be a spam-only account. Interesting to see them on loginwiki, though, as that is somewhat less common (though I haven't looked at loginwiki's abuse logs as closely). [22:59:40] .mhca ZGYGladis7644 [22:59:40] https://meta.miraheze.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/ZGYGladis7644 [22:59:58] it's actually fairly common for them to target loginwiki [23:00:03] no idea why though [23:03:39] > it's actually fairly common for them to target loginwiki ah, ok > no idea why though yeah