[00:02:15] <SamanthaNguyen>	 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10950538/how-to-detect-line-breaks-in-a-text-area-input
[00:21:27] <georgebarnick>	 doesn't sound like a good idea because they're one action, they shouldn't be logged separately... that could be misused easily
[00:51:03] <SamanthaNguyen>	 added that part to the ticket
[02:04:23] <SamanthaNguyen>	 ashley: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T155282
[02:04:52] <SamanthaNguyen>	 (if you have any response to it, as usual please put it on the ticket because otherwise it'll get lost in IRC :P )
[02:08:37] <SamanthaNguyen>	 also found a gem: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T155283
[03:33:17] <ashley>	 they're both decent long-term goals -- although I do want to note that we'll obviously want & need the branding for ShoutWiki, and I'm not sure how easy it'd be to move the $central_url stuff elsewhere...maybe with a hook or something? -- but I'd say both are lowest priority-wise because neither's breaking anything
[03:36:50] <SamanthaNguyen>	 also, here's some unrelated patches if you up for reviewing stuff at this time of day :P https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/332014/ https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/332012
[03:39:04] <SamanthaNguyen>	 ashley: Sure, although for the 2nd one (the entertaining gem), there's surely better ways to handle responsiveness than that
[03:40:06] <ashley>	 patches welcome ;-) responsiveness (even if hacky) was still too important, and based on some real-world tests it works well enough; sure, the code isn't pretty but at least it doesn't introduce any security vulnerabilities or anything -- it's just ugly; the kinda code the world is filled with, whether we like it or not
[03:42:04] <SamanthaNguyen>	 I'll try to write up a patch :)
[03:43:52] <SamanthaNguyen>	 can you take a look at the MWC textarea patch this weekend? It proves to be quite interesting (because log formatting and also when testing it out, it still doesn't allow for typing multiple lines)
[04:03:21] <ashley>	 I'm gonna be totally honest with you here and say "absolutely no promises" -- I'm super busy and I can't promise you anything for sure regarding this weekend; next week (or weekend) should be doable
[04:04:43] <SamanthaNguyen>	 Yeah that's fine, I completely understand :)
[14:53:38] <ashley>	 howdy SamanthaNguyen \o sup?
[14:54:02] <SamanthaNguyen>	 hey o/ got out of bed about an hour ago, so I'm feeling pretty good :P
[14:54:16] <ashley>	 hehe, awesome :D
[14:54:44] <SamanthaNguyen>	 also going to work on nimbus again!
[14:54:50] <SamanthaNguyen>	 how about you? :P
[15:00:58] <ashley>	 been working on this hopeless essay; committed some (untested) stuff earlier and also worked a bit on ImageRating (one of those older social tools that hasn't yet been resurrected; hoping to do that by the end of the year or so...)
[15:02:15] <SamanthaNguyen>	 imageRating? :o sounds interesting
[15:02:45] <SamanthaNguyen>	 so is it like AFTv5 (how that's reviewing/giving feedback to articles) except this is for images?
[15:02:53] <SamanthaNguyen>	 (also yes, essays suck ass)
[15:02:58] <ashley>	 basically a special page interface for categorizing and voting (VoteNY) on images
[15:03:15] <ashley>	 nevermind essays, but when it has to be a properly cited one with a minimum word count of almost 3k words... >.>
[15:03:45] <SamanthaNguyen>	 sounds like you have to write your own wikipedia article!
[15:04:07] <ashley>	 writing a Wikipedia article is easier tho :p
[15:04:12] <SamanthaNguyen>	 that's pretty neat! Let me know how ImageRating turns out
[15:04:24] <SamanthaNguyen>	 sure, but there's so many guidelines and policies :P
[15:04:50] <ashley>	 [[WP:IAR]] :)
[15:05:30] <SamanthaNguyen>	 aye, forgot about that one :P
[15:05:48] <SamanthaNguyen>	 "Ignore all rules" is quite helpful
[15:06:08] <SamanthaNguyen>	 (also I still agree though, i'd rather write up a (wikipedia) article than write up an essay :P )
[20:38:09] <ashley>	 SamanthaNguyen: thank *you* for the bug report(s) :-)
[20:38:46] <SamanthaNguyen>	 heheh, np :) i like poking around stuff and finding things to fix :P
[20:41:43] <ashley>	 and it's good that you do :D
[21:04:58] <SamanthaNguyen>	 bluh, can't find the inline style for the imageUpload-frame id
[21:05:08] <SamanthaNguyen>	 or the real-form id (#real-form)
[21:12:33] <SamanthaNguyen>	 grepping for height and 90px only returns one result in PictureGame, which is for a different element (maybe I'm just blind) ashley: do you know where it is?
[21:12:59] <SamanthaNguyen>	 also grepped for those ids and the style attribute, returned everything but inline styling for those two elements
[21:25:00] <ashley>	 seems that you might have the games mixed up; QuizGame has the #real-form element which has an inline style, PictureGame doesn't (but PictureGame has iframe#imageOneUpload-frame which has width="400" on the other hand)
[21:27:20] <SamanthaNguyen>	 ah, so it was just me being stupid :P thanks
[21:27:56] <ashley>	 no worries, it's easy to get confused here :)
[21:28:31] <ashley>	 as a bonus: some older ArmchairGM/WikiaNY skins (Games and Nimbus in practise) also have (or have had, but I'm *pretty* sure both still have) CSS related to social tools in their main CSS file >.>
[21:30:05] <SamanthaNguyen>	 ah yes, I saw that while looking them earlier today!
[21:30:13] <SamanthaNguyen>	 I'll write up a ticket about it